In an online experiment (May-June 2023), Colombian adults were randomized to a nutrient warning, guideline daily amounts (GDA), Nutri-Score, or no-label condition (n = 8,004). Fewer participants (17%) exposed to the nutrient warning indicated they would purchase a high-sugar fruit drink compared to Nutri-Score (27%, Holm-adjusted (adj) p<0.001) and no label conditions (31%, adj p<0.001); there were no differences between the nutrient warning and GDA label (14%, adj p = 0.087). Compared to all other conditions, nutrient warnings were more effective at helping participants identify that products were high in nutrients of concern, were more effective at decreasing intentions to purchase these products of concern, and were perceived as more effective. Nutrient warnings were most often selected as the label that most discouraged consumption.
Published June 10, 2024
Sign up to receive our monthly Research Roundup email, which offers a selection of new public health research from major journals.
Recent Abstracts
Trouble Brewing – The Case for Alcohol Policy (Second Edition)
Lessons from Vietnam’s Campaign for a Tax on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages
Principles of Alcohol Taxation
Clean Air in Jakarta: Gaps and Possibilities Toward Low Emission Practices
Public Attitudes Towards Alcohol Policy: South Africa
Quality Assurance and Improvement Framework for Medical Certification of Cause of Death and…
More Data Better Health: Climate and Health in the Legal Amazon
Mais Dados Mais Saúde: Clima e Saúde na Amazônia Legal
Health Taxes Action Guide
Opinión pública frente a la política de alcohol: Colombia